Otaraua Hapu Management Committee Incorporated v CIR
2026
[2026] NZHC 1304
In this case, the applicant, having been deregistered as a charity, successfully appealed Charity Services’ decision not to backdate its re-registration to the date of the original deregistration. The effect of that relief was to avoid liability for tax under s HR 12 of the Income Tax Act 2007. The decision demonstrates that a discretion exists and, in an appropriate case, will be exercised by the Court in favour of the taxpayer.
World Gospel Bible College Charitable Trust v CIR
2026
(2024) 31 NZTC 1232
In this case, the applicant had been deregistered as a charity and, having lodged its appeal out of time, sought an order that it be re-registered with effect from the date of deregistration. The evident purpose of that relief was to avoid liability for deregistration tax under s HR 12 of the Income Tax Act 2007.
TRA Case 2
2026
(2024) 31 NZTC 7002
This case concerns whether the Commissioner’s electronic transmission of the Statement of Position was effected in time, notwithstanding that it was not received in the recipient’s inbox. The Court considered the operation of s 14(7) of the Tax Administration Act, which incorporates s 214 of the Contracts and Commercial Law Act 2017, and examined the principles governing the determination of when an electronic communication is received.
CIR v Chand
2021
[2021] NZDC 16787
This is the first case dealing with the sentencing approach when a defendant has pleaded guilty to evading assessment rather than evading payment of tax under s 143B(1)(f) of the TAA
CIR v Roberts
2019
[2019] NZCA 564
I acted for the respondent Mrs Roberts in this appeal. We were successful. The Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the High Court judgment. The result was that debt forgiveness is correctly classified as a monetary gift. The government has fought a long campaign against this result and 24 hours after the Court of Appeal judgment was released issued notification that they would change the law in 2020.